Someone that has experienced few injuries, as the result of a minor accident, might not feel obligated to file a police report. However, failure to carry out that particular action would weaken the claimant’s case.
Lawyers seek the copy of such a report
The reported information could serve as proof of damages.
The reporting officer presents an unbiased view of the situation.
-That view could act as evidence of the victim’s story.
-Officer should explain nature of each victim’s injuries.
-Officer would also include quotes from each of the involved drivers.
-In addition, the officer’s report might include mention of environmental factors, such as the weather.
Both sides stand to benefit from presentation of facts in police report.
• Contains added evidence
• Contains names for witnesses
• Could contradict a claim made by either plaintiff or defendant.
• Could show a discrepancy between the plaintiff’s story and the defendant’s story
Method by which victim could arrange for police to file what an officer has reported
Personal Injury Lawyer in St Thomas will ask you to call the police as soon as possible, following the accident’s occurrence.Be cooperative; answer all of the officer’s questions, once he or she has arrived at the scene.
Ask for a copy of the reported facts and statements to be sent to your insurance provider. The name and contact information for that provider should be one of the facts collected by the police. Any driver involved in an accident must give proof of insurance, plus the name and contact information for his or her insurance company.
When reports go out to a plaintiff’s insurance provider, a copy of the same information should be sent to the defendant’s insurance provider. That action serves a protection against the filing of a false personal injury claim.
How could one of the parties make a false personal injury claim?
There have been cases where a driver kept a cane in the car, and pulled it out, following the occurrence of a collision. That action would be taken in an effort to convince the other driver that the collision had aggravated an existing injury.
That might work the first time it was tried, but an insurer could get wise to that trick. Eventually, the policyholder’s insurance company would refuse to honor the reported claims. Support for that refusal might come from facts that the police had added to their filed report.
Alternately, a defendant that had been careless, and had hit the rear of an auto might claim that the car in front had backed into the one behind it. That claim would suggest that the plaintiff was really the party at-fault. However, if the police had spoken with any witnesses, then that could help to clear up any discrepancy.